Florida ALPR

Public document reference

Automated license plate readers in Florida

On August 31, 2026, the Florida Department of Transportation revoked every permit allowing automated license plate readers in state right-of-way and gave agencies 30 days to take them down. Local officials have objected, agencies are reviewing their own programs, and statewide regulation is expected to be taken up by the Legislature.

This page collects the primary documents, so anyone following it can read them rather than read about them.

Memorandum
E&O 26-01
Issued
August 31, 2026
Removal deadline
September 30, 2026
Applies to
Readers in State Highway System right-of-way

The documents

Each is reproduced in full or linked to the body that issued it. Nothing is excerpted to make a point.

Florida Department of Transportation August 31, 2026 PDF, 1 page

Engineering and Operations Memorandum 26-01

Revokes all General Use Permits for license plate reader systems in the right-of-way of the State Highway System, directs removal by the permittee within 30 days, and discontinues issuance of future placement requests. Issued by Will Watts, P.E., Chief Operating Officer.

Office of the Mayor, City of Miami Beach September 1, 2026 PDF, 2 pages

Letter from seven South Florida mayors opposing Memorandum 26-01

Addressed to Governor DeSantis and Secretary Perdue. Requests a pause on the removal deadline, a petition process for continued permitted use under enhanced oversight and audit, municipal input as the Legislature considers statewide regulation, and published criteria distinguishing responsible programs from the misuse cited. Signed by the mayors of Miami Beach, Bay Harbor Islands, Bal Harbour Village, Aventura, Sunny Isles Beach, Golden Beach and Indian Creek Village.

CJJIS Council, hosted by FDLE Revised November 13, 2024

Guidelines for the Use of Automated License Plate Readers

Florida's uniform statewide guidelines, revised and approved by the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Information Systems Council under s. 943.08, Florida Statutes. They establish that readers and their data are for criminal justice purposes only, that deployment and access are authorized by the agency's chief executive, that users are trained, that an alert is verified before enforcement action, and that agencies keep deployment and access records, audit annually, and evaluate performance. An agency measuring its own program against a written standard should start here.

International Association of Chiefs of Police August 20, 2026

IACP Statement on the Responsible Use of Automated License Plate Recognition Technology

States support for the technology where it serves a legitimate public safety purpose, conditioned on eight safeguards covering documented lawful purpose, restricted and trained access, written policy, verification of alerts before enforcement action, auditing, response to misuse, data security and retention, and written agreements governing any sharing. The statement also announces an IACP working group and a resource page for agencies.

Two Florida statutes bear on this directly. Section 316.0777 addresses department authority over placement in state right-of-way and the confidentiality of plate reader data. Section 316.0778 is cited in the CJJIS guidelines as governing retention, and the applicable schedule is General Records Schedule GS2 for law enforcement. Agencies should read the statutes and the schedule with counsel rather than relying on any summary, including this one.

What an agency should be able to answer about its own program

Drawn entirely from the two documents above. Every question below is something the CJJIS guidelines or the IACP statement expects an agency to have settled. It is a starting point for a program review, not legal advice and not a certification of compliance.

  1. Is there a written policy, and who enforces it? The guidelines expect every agency using readers to adopt and enforce a policy covering operation, use, storage, access and retention, with the chief executive designating who administers the program. The IACP statement makes written policy one of its core conditions.
  2. Is use limited to a criminal justice purpose? Readers and their data are for criminal justice purposes only, scanning plates exposed to public view. The IACP frames the same point as a documented lawful purpose for every deployment.
  3. Is access restricted to trained, authorized people? Only trained members authorized by the chief executive may operate a reader or access stored data. Both documents treat training and role-based restriction as conditions of use, not options.
  4. Is every alert verified before enforcement action? The guidelines direct the operator to confirm the plate characters, confirm the issuing state, confirm the record is still active with the entering agency, and recognize that the driver may not be the registered owner. The IACP puts it plainly: an alert is an investigative lead, not a conclusion.
  5. Is retention set deliberately, and can you say what it is? Retention runs to the statute and the applicable records schedule, with a shorter window for tactical use than for investigative retention. An agency should be able to state its retention setting and point to the policy that justifies it.
  6. Is access logged, with a case number and a reason? Access for investigative or intelligence purposes requires an agency case number or case name and logging of the access. The IACP expects audit records that cannot be quietly altered.
  7. Is sharing deliberate, recorded, and authorized? Sharing is authorized by the chief executive, recorded, and accompanied by notice to the recipient of the applicable privacy restrictions and retention schedule. The IACP expects a written agreement governing any sharing arrangement.
  8. Is there an audit schedule and an annual evaluation? Agencies are expected to document how audits are conducted, set an annual audit schedule, assess the system's performance each year, and have a procedure for handling suspected misuse.

An agency that can answer these in writing is in a materially different position from one that cannot, whatever happens with placement in state right-of-way. Both source documents are linked above.

The case record

Florida cases in which plate reader evidence is documented as contributing to a location, an arrest, a rescue, or a conviction. Entries are drawn from news coverage and agency statements, not from any vendor's data. Cases involving several different reader systems appear here.

Real-time alerts leading to a location, stop, arrest or rescue
2025 · Broward County

Nathan Gingles triple murder and child abduction

After three people were killed in Tamarac, a nearby reader detected the suspect vehicle. Deputies located him at a North Lauderdale store within hours of the Amber Alert and recovered his four-year-old daughter, who detectives said witnessed all three killings.

Arrest warrant reporting, Local 10 News

2026 · Daytona Beach to Polk County

Jeremy Mason kidnapping

Readers in Orange County identified the suspect truck, and deputies issued a lookout to surrounding agencies. Troopers stopped the truck on State Road 570 in Polk County and found the victim in the back seat. Kidnapping and aggravated domestic assault charges followed.

WTSP

2026 · Marion County

Jason Castillo Amber Alert

A reader detection as the suspect fled south from Ocala, combined with a citizen's 911 call, led deputies to the vehicle. The 13-year-old was recovered safely within hours. Deputies stopped the vehicle on U.S. 441 and shot and killed the suspect after he pointed a handgun at them.

Ocala Gazette

2024 · Indian River County

Armando Verdecia Carralero, Orlando murder

An Indian River County reader identified the U-Haul connected to a fatal shooting. Deputies surrounded the vehicle, made the arrest and recovered a firearm.

Source not yet verified

Historical data used to reconstruct movements and build cases
2022 · Palm Harbor

Dylan Pascale, Dominick Paternoster murder

Historical images placed the suspect pickup traveling toward and away from the victim's home, and across a causeway at the point the victim's phone disappeared. The phone was recovered. Conviction for first degree murder, life sentence.

Source not yet verified

2011–12 · Pensacola Beach

Charles Boshell, Caroline Marbury-Smart murder

A fixed reader recorded the suspect vehicle at a time and place that contradicted his account. An FDLE case study describes the read as important to building the homicide case. Conviction and life sentence.

Source not yet verified

2024 · Deltona

Malik J. McKenzie, attempted double murder and home invasion

Detectives searched reads for a dark sedan carrying a stolen Florida plate, then identified the same vehicle under a Georgia plate. Historical reads reconstructed trips from Georgia to Deltona.

Source not yet verified

2025–26 · Lake County

Shahidul Islam, Monica Islam murder

Historical reads placed the suspect vehicle near the store where the victim was last seen and near the location where her body was found. The vehicle later yielded physical evidence.

Source not yet verified

Entries are added when a documented outcome is reported. Corrections to any entry are welcome and will be made.